
Hostaway Research Study | January 2026
This research report presents findings from a rigorous year-long study examining the impact of Hostaway's Dynamic Pricing solution on vacation rental performance. Using advanced Difference-in-Difference (DID) methodology—a gold-standard approach in causal inference—we isolated the true effect of dynamic pricing by controlling for market trends, seasonality, and other external factors.
Key Findings:
Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR): +25.1% increase
Occupancy Rate: +28.6% increase
Average Daily Rate (ADR): -2.5% decrease
These results demonstrate that Hostaway's Dynamic Pricing delivers substantial revenue gains by optimizing occupancy through strategic pricing, resulting in nearly 25% higher revenue performance compared to properties using manual pricing strategies.
In the competitive vacation rental market, pricing strategy is one of the most critical levers for maximizing revenue and occupancy. However, manual pricing approaches often fail to account for real-time market dynamics, seasonal fluctuations, and competitive positioning.
Hostaway's Dynamic Pricing solution leverages sophisticated AI algorithms to automatically adjust rates based on market conditions, demand patterns, and competitive intelligence. This study was designed to measure the true causal impact of implementing dynamic pricing on key performance metrics.
To quantify the incremental impact of Hostaway's Dynamic Pricing on:
Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR)
Occupancy rates
Average Daily Rate (ADR)
We employed the Difference-in-Difference (DID) method, a rigorous causal inference technique widely used in economics and policy evaluation. This approach:
Compares changes over time between treatment and control groups
Controls for time-invariant confounders that affect both groups equally
Isolates the treatment effect by removing common trends such as seasonality and market-wide changes
The DID formula removes market-level trends and seasonal effects:
DID Effect = (Treatment After − Treatment Before) − (Control After − Control Before)
Treatment Group
Hostaway listings with Dynamic Pricing enabled
Received algorithmic rate optimization throughout the study period
Control Group
Hostaway listings without Dynamic Pricing enabled
Maintained manual or static pricing approaches
To ensure comparable analysis, we addressed the challenge that control group listings don't have a natural "activation date":
Synthetic Date Assignment: Control listings were assigned synthetic activation dates using the same distribution as Dynamic Pricing listings
Purpose: This ensures comparable seasonal timing and market conditions between treatment and control groups
Benefit: Eliminates bias from seasonal enrollment patterns
To ensure analytical rigor, we applied stringent data quality measures:
Market-Level Filters:
Excluded markets with fewer than 10 Hostaway listings to ensure statistical reliability
Focused on markets with sufficient sample sizes for meaningful comparison
Listing-Level Filters:
Discarded listings with zero occupancy (inactive or non-operational properties)
Applied outlier handling: capped RevPAR, adjusted occupancy, and ADR changes at ±1,000% to prevent extreme values from skewing results
Study Duration:
12-month observation period over the 2026 calendar year
Provided sufficient data to capture seasonal variations and long-term trends
The table below presents the percentage change in key performance metrics for both Dynamic Pricing users (Treatment) and manual pricing users (Control), along with the causal DID effect:
Metric | Dynamic Pricing (Treatment) | Manual Pricing (Control) | DID Effect |
RevPAR | +69.7% | +44.6% | +25.1% |
Occupancy | +72.3% | +43.7% | +28.6% |
ADR | −1.1% | +1.4% | −2.5% |
Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR): +25.1%
The DID analysis reveals that Dynamic Pricing users achieved a 25.1 percentage point higher increase in RevPAR compared to the control group. This represents the incremental revenue benefit directly attributable to dynamic pricing, after accounting for market-wide revenue growth that affected all properties.
While both groups experienced revenue growth (reflecting overall market conditions), Dynamic Pricing users captured significantly more of that growth
The 25.1% DID effect isolates the causal impact of the pricing strategy
Occupancy Rate: +28.6%
Dynamic Pricing users saw occupancy rates increase by 28.6 percentage points more than control properties. This substantial improvement indicates that:
Algorithmic pricing successfully optimizes rates to attract more bookings
Properties avoid leaving rooms empty due to overpricing
Dynamic adjustments capture demand across different booking windows
Average Daily Rate (ADR): −2.5%
The slight decrease in ADR (−2.5%) reveals the strategic mechanism behind Dynamic Pricing's success:
The algorithm prioritizes revenue optimization over rate maximization
By strategically lowering rates when needed, the system drives higher occupancy
The net effect is significantly higher total revenue (as evidenced by the +25.1% RevPAR gain)
This finding reinforces a critical principle in revenue management: maximizing nightly rates doesn't maximize total revenue. Dynamic Pricing finds the optimal balance.
Proven Revenue Growth Implementing Dynamic Pricing delivers measurable, causal revenue improvements of over 25%, even after controlling for market trends and seasonality.
Occupancy Optimization The 28.6% occupancy improvement means fewer vacant nights and more consistent cash flow—critical for operational planning and owner satisfaction.
Strategic Pricing Philosophy The results validate the "fill the calendar" approach: modest rate adjustments that drive occupancy deliver superior total revenue compared to holding firm on high rates.
Maximized Returns Owners benefit from substantially higher revenue generation without requiring operational changes or increased effort.
Data-Driven Confidence Rigorous causal analysis provides confidence that these gains are not merely coincidental market improvements but direct results of the pricing strategy.
Market-Appropriate Rates Dynamic pricing ensures rates reflect true market conditions, creating better value perception and driving conversion.
Many performance studies suffer from selection bias or fail to account for confounding factors like seasonality and market trends. Our Difference-in-Difference approach addresses these challenges by:
Removing market-wide effects: Both groups experience the same external market conditions; DID isolates what's different
Controlling for seasonality: Synthetic date assignment ensures seasonal comparability
Establishing causality: Not just correlation—we measure the incremental effect of Dynamic Pricing
This study analyzed actual Hostaway listings over a full year, capturing:
Real market dynamics
Diverse property types and locations
Seasonal variations and demand fluctuations
Authentic operational conditions
This comprehensive study provides compelling evidence that Hostaway's Dynamic Pricing delivers substantial, measurable revenue improvements. Using rigorous Difference-in-Difference methodology to establish causality, we found:
25.1% increase in Revenue per Available Room
28.6% increase in Occupancy rates
Strategic pricing optimization that prioritizes total revenue over nightly rate maximization
For vacation rental property managers seeking to maximize revenue, improve occupancy, and leverage data-driven pricing strategies, these results demonstrate that Dynamic Pricing is not just a convenience—it's a proven revenue driver with quantifiable business impact.
The findings underscore a fundamental truth in revenue management: optimal pricing is not about charging the highest rate possible, but about finding the rate that maximizes total revenue. Hostaway's Dynamic Pricing achieves exactly that.
Learn more about Hostaway Dynamic Pricing and schedule a demo at hostaway.com
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ANSCHrms5DE?si=WtbpuydAEfigG77U" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
